Going Green is FUN!
Sure, it’s a challenge, but challenges are fun. Yes, it take thought and ingenuity, but so does winning levels at any game.
World of Warcraft and Age of Empires are great, but Greening Earth is a game we play for real money and real treasure!
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Portuguese As A 21st Century Language
When George W Bush mocked the Portuguese Language (calling a program to encourage its study "wasteful" and "pork"), was he just showing his ignorance of its strategic significance?
Portuguese is the dominant language of the fifth-largest nation in the world: Brazil. It is the largest and most powerful democracy in South America, and a leader in energy independence.
Bush's wars in the Middle East have suffered because of America's ignorance on Arabic and other languages, e.g. Parsee. Is he really too stupid to see that, in the 21st century, America needs to study the languages of ALL major countries?
LINKS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y-hkmfSkew
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/11/20071113-7.html
Portuguese is the dominant language of the fifth-largest nation in the world: Brazil. It is the largest and most powerful democracy in South America, and a leader in energy independence.
Bush's wars in the Middle East have suffered because of America's ignorance on Arabic and other languages, e.g. Parsee. Is he really too stupid to see that, in the 21st century, America needs to study the languages of ALL major countries?
LINKS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y-hkmfSkew
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/11/20071113-7.html
Friday, November 09, 2007
Wednesday, November 07, 2007
Lying About Deficits (A Parable)
Some fools say that deficits aren't bad if the deficit is less than "average".
To explain how stupid that is, let's use some rough numbers (not necessarily accurate, but they show the concept).
Once upon a time, USA.com wanted to borrow some money to cover operating expenses (not investments).
Its CEO, Reagan, wanted to borrow 2% of its income. The Banks said "You're up to 10% of your income, fine."
Then Reagan wanted3% more of its income. The Banks said "You're up to 13% of your income."
Then its CEO, Reagan, borrowed 4% more of its income. The Banks said "You're up to 17% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 4% more. The Banks said "You're up to 21% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 25% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 29% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 3% more. Banks said "You're up to 32% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 3% more. Banks said "You're up to 35% of your income."
Then USC.com got a new CEO, Bush.
Bush wanted 3% more. Banks said "You're up to 38%."
Bush wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 42%."
Bush wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 46%."
Bush wanted 5% more. Banks said "You're up to 51%."
Then USC.com got a new CEO, Clinton.
Clinton continued to borrow, but less and less until finally he started paying off the debt.
Then USC.com got a new CEO, W.
W wanted 1% more. Banks said "You're up to 52%."
W wanted 3% more. Banks said "You're up to 55%."
W wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 59%."
W wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 63%."
W wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 67%."
Then W wanted to borrow another 3%. Why not? 3% more is less than the AVERAGE of the past decades.
The banks said, "WHAT???? ARE YOU CRAZY??? You're DEEP in DEBT. The AVERAGE of what you borrow per year means NOTHING; in assessing your credit worthiness, how much you owe is more important."
To explain how stupid that is, let's use some rough numbers (not necessarily accurate, but they show the concept).
Once upon a time, USA.com wanted to borrow some money to cover operating expenses (not investments).
Its CEO, Reagan, wanted to borrow 2% of its income. The Banks said "You're up to 10% of your income, fine."
Then Reagan wanted3% more of its income. The Banks said "You're up to 13% of your income."
Then its CEO, Reagan, borrowed 4% more of its income. The Banks said "You're up to 17% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 4% more. The Banks said "You're up to 21% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 25% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 29% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 3% more. Banks said "You're up to 32% of your income."
Then Reagan wanted 3% more. Banks said "You're up to 35% of your income."
Then USC.com got a new CEO, Bush.
Bush wanted 3% more. Banks said "You're up to 38%."
Bush wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 42%."
Bush wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 46%."
Bush wanted 5% more. Banks said "You're up to 51%."
Then USC.com got a new CEO, Clinton.
Clinton continued to borrow, but less and less until finally he started paying off the debt.
Then USC.com got a new CEO, W.
W wanted 1% more. Banks said "You're up to 52%."
W wanted 3% more. Banks said "You're up to 55%."
W wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 59%."
W wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 63%."
W wanted 4% more. Banks said "You're up to 67%."
Then W wanted to borrow another 3%. Why not? 3% more is less than the AVERAGE of the past decades.
The banks said, "WHAT???? ARE YOU CRAZY??? You're DEEP in DEBT. The AVERAGE of what you borrow per year means NOTHING; in assessing your credit worthiness, how much you owe is more important."
Sunday, November 04, 2007
Bush: "Jesus Was Not Tortured!!!"
According to the Bybee memo, it's not torture unless there's organ failure.
NONE of Jesus's organs failed. Whippings do not cause organ failure, and crucifixion is DESIGNED to keep the victim ALIVE for days.
Jesus died unexpectedly, early in the process, after only a few hours on the cross.
By Bush's logic, there was no torture.
Just "Death By Natural Causes"
According to the Bybee memo, it's not torture unless there's organ failure.
NONE of Jesus's organs failed. Whippings do not cause organ failure, and crucifixion is DESIGNED to keep the victim ALIVE for days.
Jesus died unexpectedly, early in the process, after only a few hours on the cross.
By Bush's logic, there was no torture.
Just "Death By Natural Causes"
Friday, November 02, 2007
How Bush Plans to Escape Jail ... And What To Do About It
George W Bush knows he's committed many felonies. (It's not worth arguing the point; if you are still in denial about his lying to Congress, felony FISA violations, participation in a conspiracy to out a spy in time of war, and so on ... this is not for you.)
Think like he does. Bush knows he's got a problem, or at least his advisers do. George may be too arrogant or, more likely, more added from decades of coke and booze to realize he's being fitted for an orange jumpsuit, but his cronies know that the day he goes into a cell is the day he testifies against them. So how does Bush avoid prosecution for his many felonies?
What would YOU do if you were he?
The Libby Obstruction of Justice and Perjury case points the way. Bush plans to get a pardon! Of course he can't give it to himself.
But he can pardon Cheney on the night before Bush leaves office. Then, Bush can himself resign. Why not?
Cheney is then sworn in, and pardons Bush. Who's gonna stop them?
The theory is that now each have pardons and can flick their fingers at the justice system!
The hole in the theory is this: pardons cover only past crimes, not future crimes or crimes committed in the act of issuing a pardon.
Any otherwise legal act becomes a crime if committed in furtherance of another crime, including a past crime. This is the basis of the crime of "conspiracy". Issuing a pardon (or other executive clemency, e.g. commuting Libby's sentence) for the purpose of obstructing justice ... or as the culmination of a plan to commit crimes such as lying to Congress ... is an act of conspiracy. The act of giving or receiving a pardon cannot wipe out the crime committed in giving or receiving the pardon.
It is important to spread this idea about. Conventional Wisdom is that America will be happy to let George and Dick go on vacation with their ill-gotten gains, their crimes forgotten by the same pardon process that kept Nixon out of jail.
But it does not have to be that way. If we expect the conspiracy, we can rob it of its effectiveness.
Think like he does. Bush knows he's got a problem, or at least his advisers do. George may be too arrogant or, more likely, more added from decades of coke and booze to realize he's being fitted for an orange jumpsuit, but his cronies know that the day he goes into a cell is the day he testifies against them. So how does Bush avoid prosecution for his many felonies?
What would YOU do if you were he?
The Libby Obstruction of Justice and Perjury case points the way. Bush plans to get a pardon! Of course he can't give it to himself.
But he can pardon Cheney on the night before Bush leaves office. Then, Bush can himself resign. Why not?
Cheney is then sworn in, and pardons Bush. Who's gonna stop them?
The theory is that now each have pardons and can flick their fingers at the justice system!
The hole in the theory is this: pardons cover only past crimes, not future crimes or crimes committed in the act of issuing a pardon.
Any otherwise legal act becomes a crime if committed in furtherance of another crime, including a past crime. This is the basis of the crime of "conspiracy". Issuing a pardon (or other executive clemency, e.g. commuting Libby's sentence) for the purpose of obstructing justice ... or as the culmination of a plan to commit crimes such as lying to Congress ... is an act of conspiracy. The act of giving or receiving a pardon cannot wipe out the crime committed in giving or receiving the pardon.
It is important to spread this idea about. Conventional Wisdom is that America will be happy to let George and Dick go on vacation with their ill-gotten gains, their crimes forgotten by the same pardon process that kept Nixon out of jail.
But it does not have to be that way. If we expect the conspiracy, we can rob it of its effectiveness.
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
The Lucky Penny Theory of Investing.
1. Get 1024 pennies.
2. Every morning, ask them "Will the market go UP (Heads) or DOWN (Tails)" and flip them all.
3. If the market goes UP, discard the Tails; If the market goes DOWN, discard the Heads. (On average, you will discard half your pennies).
4. The next day, if you have more than 1 penny left, go back to step 2.
5. At this point, you have 1 penny left. This penny has SUCCESSFULLY predicted something like 10 DAYS of market performance.
This is your LUCKY PENNY! It is clearly more successful than any human at predicting the market!
Give it a salary and a bonus.
Sunday, October 28, 2007
Giulidammerung: Twilight of the GOP
Giulidammerung is the last of the four opera that comprise Der Riun des Reagenungen (The Ruin of Reaganism), by Richard Viguerie. It received its premiere at the RNC Konventionhaus on September 1, 2008.
The title refers to a prophesied war of the corporatists which brings about the end of the GOP.
Prologue
The three Pollsters, daughters of MSM, gather beside the 35W bridge, weaving the rope of Conventional Wisdom that binds even the gods.
Act I
The act begins in the Hall of the Republicans, a people visiting Minneapolis.
GeorgeW, lord of the Republicans, sits enthroned but everyone is embarassed to be seen with him in public.
Rudyfried arrives, disguised as Reagan, and claims the nomination for the Oval Office of Power.
Act II
Norquist, waiting by the bank of the Mississippi, is visited in his sleep by his spiritual father, Reagan. He swears that no New York, pro-abortion, anti-gun flip-flopping liberal shall have the Oval.
Act III
In the cemetary at Arlington, the Rheinwidows mourn their lost troops.
Rudyfried happens by; they urge him to bring the troops home and avoid Iraq's curse, but he ignores their tidings of doom.
They swim away, predicting that Rudyfried will fail and that his heir, a lady, will treat them more fairly.
The cemetary overflows its banks, engulfing Rudyfried as the GOP bursts into flames.
The curtain falls.
The title refers to a prophesied war of the corporatists which brings about the end of the GOP.
Prologue
The three Pollsters, daughters of MSM, gather beside the 35W bridge, weaving the rope of Conventional Wisdom that binds even the gods.
Act I
The act begins in the Hall of the Republicans, a people visiting Minneapolis.
GeorgeW, lord of the Republicans, sits enthroned but everyone is embarassed to be seen with him in public.
Rudyfried arrives, disguised as Reagan, and claims the nomination for the Oval Office of Power.
Act II
Norquist, waiting by the bank of the Mississippi, is visited in his sleep by his spiritual father, Reagan. He swears that no New York, pro-abortion, anti-gun flip-flopping liberal shall have the Oval.
Act III
In the cemetary at Arlington, the Rheinwidows mourn their lost troops.
Rudyfried happens by; they urge him to bring the troops home and avoid Iraq's curse, but he ignores their tidings of doom.
They swim away, predicting that Rudyfried will fail and that his heir, a lady, will treat them more fairly.
The cemetary overflows its banks, engulfing Rudyfried as the GOP bursts into flames.
The curtain falls.
Friday, September 28, 2007
The Atheist and the Zoroastrian
"Our religious beliefs are nearly identical," said the atheist.
"My friend, how can that be?" asked the Zoroastrian.
"Behold, here is a list of 100 Gods: Thor, Zeus, Vishnu, The Great White Spirit, and so on," said the atheist. "Which, if any, do you believe do not exist?"
"Why, 99 of those are complete fictions. Only the great Mazda is real!" proclaimed the Zoroastrian.
"Then we agree 99/100ths of the time," concluded the atheist. "I merely take your principle one god farther."
"Our religious beliefs are nearly identical," said the atheist.
"My friend, how can that be?" asked the Zoroastrian.
"Behold, here is a list of 100 Gods: Thor, Zeus, Vishnu, The Great White Spirit, and so on," said the atheist. "Which, if any, do you believe do not exist?"
"Why, 99 of those are complete fictions. Only the great Mazda is real!" proclaimed the Zoroastrian.
"Then we agree 99/100ths of the time," concluded the atheist. "I merely take your principle one god farther."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)